The data are based on a combined fit by
(1) H. S. P. Müller, 2023, unpublished.
Hyperfine-resolved transition frequencies in the
ground vibrational state were
reported by
(2) O. Asvany, C. R. Markus, A. Roucou, S. Schlemmer,
S. Thorwirth, and C. Lauzin,
2021, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 378, Art. No. 111447.
Submillimeter data come from
(3) J. Cernicharo, S. Bailleux, E. Alekseev, A. Fuente,
E. Roueff, M. Gerin, B. Tercero, S. P. Treviño-Morales,
N. Marcelino, R. Bachiller, and B. Lefloch,
2014, Astrophys. J. 795, Art. No. 40.
We have attributed 20 kHz as uncertainties to these data
in the present calculations. This may still be somewhat
conservative.
Infrared transition frequencies from
(4) W. C. Ho, I. Ozier, D. T. Cramb, and M. C. L. Gerry,
1991, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 149, 559;
and from
(5) M. López-Puertas, J.-M. Flaud, J. Peralta-Calvillo,
B. Funke, and S. Gil-López,
2006, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 237, 218
were also used in the fit.
The calculations may be reliable throughout; some
caution may be advised for J > 35.
Quantum-chemical calculations of the dipole moments were taken
from
(6) R. Polák and R. Fiser,
2004, Chem. Phys. 303, 73.
The spin-multiplicity of the 14N nucleus was
considered in the calculation of the partition function.
Contributions from the first excited vibrational state to the
partition function were considered also, but are essentially
negligible at 300 K.
|