With respect to the first entry from Jan. 2010, intensities were corrected, and additional data were used. The current entry follows still largely
(1) B. J. Drouin, S. Yu, C. E. Miller, H. S. P. Müller, F. Lewen, S. Brünken, and H. Habara, 2010, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 111, 1167.
This work provides new data between 0.42 and 1.88 THz. Additional sub-mmW data were taken from
(2) L. R. Zink and M. Mizushima, 1987, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 125, 154;
and from
(3) G. Y. Golubyatnikov and A. F. Krupnov, 2003, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 217, 282.
One line of (2) was omitted because of large residuals, and one line was retained. Two additional transition frequencies were taken from
(4) B. J. Drouin and H. S. P. Müller, 2010, unpublished.
The mmW data were taken from
(5) J. S. Knight and W. Gordy, 1968, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 1787;
from
(6) Y. Endo and M. Mizushima, 1982, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 21, L379;
and from
(7) M. Y. Tretyakov, M. A. Koshelev, V. V. Dorovskikh, D. S. Makarov, and P. W. Rosenkranz, 2005, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 231, 1.
For multiply measured transitions differing in uncertainties by less than a factor of 2 weighted averaged have been derived. The value for H was kept fixed to that derived from
(8) S. Yu, B. J. Drouin, C. E. Miller, and H. S. P. Müller, 2012, J. Chem. Phys. 137, Art. No. 024304.
Predictions should be viewed with caution if the calculated uncertainties exceed 0.3 MHz.
Intensities were calculated based on the main g value obtained by magnetic resonance in
(9) K. D. Bowers, R. A. Kamper, and C. D. Lustig, 1959, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, 251, 565.
Intensities at low values of N are not affected, but those at higher N are now calculated to be much weaker, in accordance with
(10) M. Toureille, S. Béguier, T. A. Odintsova, M. Y. Tretyakov, O. Pirali, and A. Campargue, 2020, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 242, Art. No. 106709.