The experimental frequencies have been reported
by
(1) F. F. Gardner, P. D. Godfrey, and D. R. Williams,
1980, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 193, 713;
by
(2) S. Blanco, J. C. Lopez, A. Lessari, and J. L. Alonso,
2006, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 12111;
and by
(3) A. V. Kryvda, V. G. Gerasimov, S. F. Dyubko,
E. A. Alekseev, R. A. Motiyenko,
2009, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 254, 28.
Additional microwave transitions were also considered.
These were taken from
(4) M. Stubgaard, PhD thesis,
1978, Københavns Universitet.
Claus Nielsen and Matt Johnson are thanked for
providing the data from (4).
With respect to the May 2009 entrty, additional
submillimeter data up to 930 GHz were taken
from
(5) R. A. Motiyenko, B. Tercero, J. Cernicharo,
and L. Margulès,
2012, Astron. Astrophys. 548, Art. No. A71.
Diagonal sextic and higher distortion parameters were
taken from the main isotopolog, the off-diaginal
ones were scaled.
Predictions with uncertainties larger than 0.3 MHz
should be viewed with caution. This is probably not
a limitation for any astronomical observations.
14N hyperfine splitting may be resolved
for low values of J. Therefore, a
separate hyperfine calculation is provided for
J" = J' ≤ 10 and
frequencies below 100 GHz along with
partition function values.
Vibrational contributions to the partition function
will be provided in the future.
The dipole moment was assumed to agree with that
of the main isotopolog, which was determined
by
(6) R. J. Kurland and E. B. Wilson,
1957, J. Chem. Phys. 27, 585.
|