The anti conformer of ethanol is lower
in energy than the symmetric and antisymmetric
combinations of the gauche conformer
by 39.49 and 42.77 cm1,
respectively, as determined for the main
isotopolog by
(1) J. C. Pearson, C. S. Brauer, and B. J. Drouin,
2008, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 251, 394.
These conformers are caused by the large amplitude
motion of the OH-group.
Even though there is extensive internal rotation
interaction between the anti and the
gauche conformers, the energy differences
permit these interactions to be neglected for
transitions with low quantum numbers;
in practice, for transitions with
J + 2Ka
≤ 32; in the case of the methyl
monodeuterated isotopolog, the value may be
slightly larger, at least at low values of
Ka.
The analysis was restricted to such transitions
because these are the ones most likely to be
observed by radioastronomical means.
The internal rotation of the methyl group is
actually frozen out for isotopologs with at least
one D in the methyl group. This leads to two
distinguishable conformers for the CH2D
isotopolog. Data of both conformers appear in
separate entries.
The data have been summaried by
(2) A. Walters, M. Schäfer, M. Ordu, F. Lewen,
S. Schlemmer, and H. S. P. Müller,
2015, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 314, 6.
Additional microwave frequencies have been reported
by
(3) J. P. Culot,
1971, PhD thesis, Université Catolique Louvain.
Predictions with J + 2Ka
> 32 should be viewed with caution.
The predictions have been truncated at
J = 60 and
Ka = 10.
Note:
The partition function does not take into account
the gauche-conformers. Therefore,
scaled partition function values are available.
The scaling factors were taken from the main
isotopolog and refer to the ground vibrational
state (anti plus gauche conformers
versus only the anti conformer). The correction
should be quite good. The first excited methyl and OH
torsional modes are both about 250 cm1
above ground for the main isotolog, and this value
may differ somewhat for the deuterated isotopologs.
The dipole moment was assumed to agree with
that of the main species. This assumption
should be very good for the large b
dipole moment component, but may be very different
for the almost vanishing a dipole
moment component. The values were taken
from
(4) M. Takano, Y. Sasada, and T. Satoh,
1968, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 26, 157.
|