The majority of the data were taken
from
(1) L. Margulès, B. Tercero, J.-C. Guillemin,
R. A. Motiyenko, and J. Cernicharo,
2018, Astron. Astrophys., 610, Art. No. A44.
Additional data were contributed by
(2) R. J. Anderson and W. D. Gwinn,
1968, J. Chem. Phys., 49, 3988;
by
(3) E. Fliege and H. Dreizler,
1985, Z. Naturforsch. A, 40, 43;
and in particular by
(4) M. Krüger and H. Dreizler,
1992, Z. Naturforsch. A, 47, 1067.
The parameter set is similar to the S-reduction set in (1).
The predictions are sufficiently accurate for all astronomical
observations. They should be viewed with caution once the
predicted uncertainties exceed 0.2 MHz. Internal rotation
as well as 14N hyperfine structure splitting are
probably unimportant for all astronomical observations.
The dipole moment components were determined in (2).
|