The entry was updated with resypect to the first entry from Sep. 2002 and Feb. 2011. The majority of the rotational lines are from
(1) M. Caris, F. Lewen, and G. Winnewisser, 2002, Z. Naturforsch. 57a, 663. Additional lower frequency data are from
(2) P. L. Clouser and W. Gordy, 1964, Phys. Rev. 134, 863.
Further, new lower frequency data are from
(3) C. Cabezas, J. Cernicharo, G. Quintana-Lacaci, I. Peña, M. Agundez, L. Velilla Prieto, A. Castro-Carrizo, J. Zuñiga, A. Bastida, J. L. Alonso, and A. Requena, 2016, Astrophys. J. 825, Art. No. 150;
and from
(4) B. A. Timp, J. L. Doran, S. Iyer, J.-U. Grabow, and K. R. Leopold, 2012, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 271, 20.
The data reported and used in the fit extend to v = 6. Rovibrational transitions were taken from
(5) R. S. Ram, M. Dulick, B. Guo, K.-Q. Zhang, P. F. Bernath, 1997, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 183, 360;
from
(6) H. Uehara, K. Horiai, K. Nakagawa, and T. Fujimoto, 1989, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 134, 98;
and from
(7) K. Horiai, T. Fujimoto, K. Nakagawa, and H. Uehara, 1989, Chem. Phys. Lett. 147, 133.
The data reported and used in the fit extend to v = 8. The analysis follows largely that in (3), meaning that data for the ³⁵Cl and ³⁷Cl isotopologs were fit together.
²³Na and ³⁵Cl hyperfine splitting is negligible except possibly for very low values of J.
Predictions should be reliable throughout for v up to at least 5. They should be still quite good up to v = 10. Caution is advised for even higher v. The partition function takes into account all states up to v = 30. The dipole moments were calculated according to an empirical formula from
(8) F. H. de Leeuw, R. van Wachem, and A. Dymanus, 1970, J. Chem. Phys. 53, 981.