There are two conformers in propanal caused by the
internal rotation of the aldehyde group -CHO.
The syn-conformer is the lowest energy
conformer. It has all the heavy atoms in the
ab-plane; for this matter, it is sometimes
called cis. The two equivalent
gauche-conformers are approximately
420 ± 27 cm1
higher in energy as derived from relative intensity
measurements. Other measurements largely support
this value, even though they show some scatter.
The first entry from Dec. 2008 has been revised
considerably. Even though internal rotation of the
methyl group has been resolved in the vibrational
ground state only in part in the laboratory, it does
matter in some sources with narrow lines.
The present fit was performed with ERHAM and is
described in
(1) O. Zingsheim, H. S. P. Müller, F. Lewen,
J. K. Jørgensen, and S. Schlemmer,
2017, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 342, 125.
By far the most data come from that study.
Additional microwave frequencies have been reported
by
(2) J. A. Hardy, A. P. Cox, E. Fliege,
and H. Dreizler,
1982, Z. Naturforsch. 37a, 1035.
The millimeter wave data by
(3) J. Demaison, H. Maes, B. P. van Eijck,
G. Wlodarczak, and M. C. Lasne,
1987, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 125, 214;
were helpful for the initial assignments, but were
largely remeasured. The remainder of the lines were
omitted.
State number 0 indicates methyl rotor states with
A symmetry, 1 those with E symmetry.
Please note that the Kc labeling
may be incorrect for some prolate paired transition,
i.e., transitions with high Ka
with no or possibly even unresolved asymmetry
splitting. As an additional consequence, a small
number of experimental lines have not been merged
in the default catalog file.
The predictions should be accurate enough for all
astronomical observations. They should be viewed
with caution if the predicted uncertainties are
larger than 0.3 MHz and for b-type
transitions with Ka much larger
than 25.
The partition function includes only the ground
vibrational state. Vibrational and conformational
correction factors should be available in the near future.
The dipole moment was reported in
(4) S. S. Butcher and E. B. Wilson, jr.,
1964, J. Chem. Phys. 40, 1671.
|