Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- molecules:ism:c10h [2023/02/27 13:26] – mueller
+++ molecules:ism:c10h [2023/09/04 15:13] (current) – mueller
@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 The identification was made by stacking data from the line survey up to 30 GHz; most signal-contribution came from the 13.1 to 19.2 GHz region. The authors also report a tentative detection of C<sub>10</sub>H with a C<sub>10</sub>H<sup>–</sup> to C<sub>10</sub>H of roughly 2. In addition, C<sub>10</sub>H<sup>–</sup> is roughly 5 times more abundant than C<sub>8</sub>H<sup>–</sup> and about one third more abundant than C<sub>6</sub>H<sup>–</sup>.\\
 \\
+More recently,\\
+J. R. Pardo, C. Cabezas, M. Agúndez, B. Tercero, N. Marcelino, P. de Vicente, M. Guélin, and J. Cernicharo\\
+found\\
+**[[https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346498|A new heavy anion in IRC+10216: Theory favors C10H− versus C9N−]]**\\
+//Astron. Astrophys.// **677**, Art. No. A55 (2023).\\
+This time around, the molecule was identified in 15 not or not strongly blended transitions with 51 ≤ //J// ≤ 71 between 31 and 43 GHz in the course of a molecular line survey of the famous carbon rich AGB star CW Leonis carried out with the Yebes 40 m radio telescope.\\
 ----
-Contributor(s): H. S. P. Müller; 2, 2023
+Contributor(s): H. S. P. Müller; 02, 2023; 09, 2023
 ----