molecules:ism:c10h

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
molecules:ism:c10h [2023/02/27 13:11] – created muellermolecules:ism:c10h [2023/09/04 15:13] (current) mueller
Line 5: Line 5:
 **[[https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acb648|Astronomical Detection of the Interstellar Anion C<sub>10</sub>H<sup>–</sup> toward TMC-1 from the GOTHAM Large Program on the Green Bank Telescope]]**\\ **[[https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acb648|Astronomical Detection of the Interstellar Anion C<sub>10</sub>H<sup>–</sup> toward TMC-1 from the GOTHAM Large Program on the Green Bank Telescope]]**\\
 //Astrophys. J. Lett.// **944**, Art. No. L45 (2023).\\ //Astrophys. J. Lett.// **944**, Art. No. L45 (2023).\\
 +The identification was made by stacking data from the line survey up to 30 GHz; most signal-contribution came from the 13.1 to 19.2 GHz region. The authors also report a tentative detection of C<sub>10</sub>H with a C<sub>10</sub>H<sup>–</sup> to C<sub>10</sub>H of roughly 2. In addition, C<sub>10</sub>H<sup>–</sup> is roughly 5 times more abundant than C<sub>8</sub>H<sup>–</sup> and about one third more abundant than C<sub>6</sub>H<sup>–</sup>.\\
 +\\
 +
 +More recently,\\
 +J. R. Pardo, C. Cabezas, M. Agúndez, B. Tercero, N. Marcelino, P. de Vicente, M. Guélin, and J. Cernicharo\\
 +found\\
 +**[[https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346498|A new heavy anion in IRC+10216: Theory favors C10H− versus C9N−]]**\\
 +//Astron. Astrophys.// **677**, Art. No. A55 (2023).\\
 +This time around, the molecule was identified in 15 not or not strongly blended transitions with 51 ≤ //J// ≤ 71 between 31 and 43 GHz in the course of a molecular line survey of the famous carbon rich AGB star CW Leonis carried out with the Yebes 40 m radio telescope.\\
 +
 +
 +----
 +
 +Contributor(s): H. S. P. Müller; 02, 2023; 09, 2023
 +
 +----
 +
 +
  • molecules/ism/c10h.1677499899.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2023/02/27 13:11
  • by mueller