This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |
| molecules:ism:c6h3n [2022/07/22 14:20] – mueller | molecules:ism:c6h3n [2022/07/22 14:22] (current) – mueller |
|---|
| R. Fuentetaja, C. Cabezas, M. Agúndez, B. Tercero, N. Marcelino, J. R. Pardo, P. de Vicente, and J. Cernicharo\\ | R. Fuentetaja, C. Cabezas, M. Agúndez, B. Tercero, N. Marcelino, J. R. Pardo, P. de Vicente, and J. Cernicharo\\ |
| reported on the\\ | reported on the\\ |
| **[[https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243857|Discovery of CH<sub>2</sub>CCHC<sub>4</sub>H and a Rigorous Detection of H<sub>2</sub>CCCHC<sub>3</sub>N in TMC-1 with the QUIJOTE Line Survey]]**\\ | **[[https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243857|Discovery of CH<sub>2</sub>CCHC<sub>4</sub>H and a Rigorous Detection of CH<sub>2</sub>CCHC<sub>3</sub>N in TMC-1 with the QUIJOTE Line Survey]]**\\ |
| //Astron. Astrophys.// **663**, Art. No. L3 (2022).\\ | //Astron. Astrophys.// **663**, Art. No. L3 (2022).\\ |
| H<sub>2</sub>CCCHC<sub>3</sub>N was identified in TMC-1 for the first time through individual lines. The H<sub>2</sub>CCCHC<sub>4</sub>H to H<sub>2</sub>CCCHC<sub>3</sub>N ratio was determined as 18 ± 4, somewhat higher than the C<sub>4</sub>H to C<sub>3</sub>N ratio of ~8.\\ | H<sub>2</sub>CCCHC<sub>3</sub>N was identified in TMC-1 for the first time through individual lines. The H<sub>2</sub>CCCHC<sub>4</sub>H to H<sub>2</sub>CCCHC<sub>3</sub>N ratio was determined as 18 ± 4, somewhat higher than the C<sub>4</sub>H to C<sub>3</sub>N ratio of ~8.\\ |