Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
molecules:ism:cyanopropargyl [2021/11/03 13:38]
mueller created
molecules:ism:cyanopropargyl [2021/11/03 14:14] (current)
mueller
Line 1: Line 1:
 ===== On the Detection of Cyanopropargyl in the ISM ===== ===== On the Detection of Cyanopropargyl in the ISM =====
  
 +C. Cabezas, M. Agúndez, N. Marcelino, B. Tercero, J. R. Pardo, P. de Vicente, and J. Cernicharo \\
 +reported on the\\
 +**[[https://​doi.org/​10.1051/​0004-6361/​202142156|Discovery of Interstellar 3-Cyanopropargyl Radical, CH<​sub>​2</​sub>​CCCN]]**\\
 +//Astron. Astrophys.//​ **654**, Art. No. L9 (2021).\\
 +//​ortho//​-CH<​sub>​2</​sub>​C<​sub>​3</​sub>​N was identified through three //a//-type transitions with //J// = 8 − 7 to 10 − 9 and //​K<​sub>​a</​sub>//​ = 0 in the course of a molecular line survey of the prototypical cold dark molecular cloud TMC-1 carried out with the Yebes 40 m radio telescope between 31.0 and 50.4 GHz. These transitions displayed partially resolved fine and hyperfine structure splitting; few components were blended by lines of other species. Also observed were four transitions of //​para//​-CH<​sub>​2</​sub>​C<​sub>​3</​sub>​N with //J// = 8 − 7 or 9 − 8 and //​K<​sub>​a</​sub>//​ = 1, which displayed well resolved fine structure splitting; some of these lines were also blended. A value of //​T//<​sub>​rot</​sub>​ = 7 ± 1 K was derived. The column density of CH<​sub>​2</​sub>​C<​sub>​3</​sub>​N is about a factor of 100 lower than that of CH<​sub>​2</​sub>​CN. And while CH<​sub>​2</​sub>​C<​sub>​3</​sub>​N is roughly a factor of 10 less abundant than CH<​sub>​3</​sub>​C<​sub>​3</​sub>​N,​ CH<​sub>​2</​sub>​CN is **more abundant** than CH<​sub>​3</​sub>​CN by a factor of about 3.\\
 +
 +
 +
 +----
 +
 +Contributor(s):​ H. S. P. Müller; 11, 2021
 +
 +----
  
  • molecules/ism/cyanopropargyl.1635943136.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2021/11/03 13:38
  • by mueller