Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- molecules:ism:hccnc [2024/04/08 13:39] – mueller
+++ molecules:ism:hccnc [2024/04/08 17:57] – mueller
@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 **[[https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348822|Study of the HCCNC and HNCCC isotopologs in TMC-1]]**\\
 //Astron. Astrophys.// **682**, Art. No. L13 (2024).\\
-They reported in the framework of improved data of the above survey the detection of HCC<sup>15</sup>NC with a <sup>14</sup>N/<sup>15</sup>N ratio of roughly 240, slightly lower than ~317 obtained for HC<sub>3</sub>N. However, this value may be affected by a probable but at that time unrecognized blending of the //J// = 5 − 4 transition of HCC<sup>15</sup>NC. They also redetermined the <sup>12</sup>C/<sup>13</sup>C ratios. The values are ~95 with scatter that is insignificant with respect to the uncertainties. These values are somewhat lower than ~65 usually found in the the local ISM.
+They reported in the framework of improved data of the above survey the detection of HCC<sup>15</sup>NC with a <sup>14</sup>N/<sup>15</sup>N ratio of roughly 240, slightly lower than ~317 obtained for HC<sub>3</sub>N. However, this value may be affected by a probable but at that time unrecognized blending of the //J// = 5 − 4 transition of HCC<sup>15</sup>NC (J. Cernicharo, private communication). They also redetermined the <sup>12</sup>C/<sup>13</sup>C ratios. The values are ~95 with scatter that is insignificant with respect to the uncertainties. These values are somewhat lower than ~65 usually found in the the local ISM, but very similar to values of HNC<sub>3</sub> <sup>13</sup>C isotopomers and to two of the three HC<sub>3</sub>N <sup>13</sup>C isotopomers. An H/D ratio of ~31 was reported, but it appears again as if the //J// = 5 − 4 transition of DCCNC is too strong. The ratio from 4 − 3 alone would be closer to ~55 observed for HNC<sub>3</sub> and HC<sub>3</sub>N.\\
+\\
 ----