Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| molecules:ism:sio [2026/07/29 12:37] – mueller | molecules:ism:sio [2026/08/25 10:17] (current) – mueller | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| L. E. Snyder and D. Buhl\\ | L. E. Snyder and D. Buhl\\ | ||
| proposed the\\ | proposed the\\ | ||
| - | **[[https:// | + | **[[https:// |
| // | // | ||
| Orion A was observed with the 11 m Kitt Peak telescope. The frequency coincidence with the //J// = 2 – 1 transition of SiO in its first excited vibrational state was noted.\\ | Orion A was observed with the 11 m Kitt Peak telescope. The frequency coincidence with the //J// = 2 – 1 transition of SiO in its first excited vibrational state was noted.\\ | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| J. H. Davis, G. N. Blair, H. van Till, and P. Thaddeus,\\ | J. H. Davis, G. N. Blair, H. van Till, and P. Thaddeus,\\ | ||
| who studied\\ | who studied\\ | ||
| - | **[[https:// | + | **[[https:// |
| // | // | ||
| They observed the //J// = 3 – 2 transition of SiO.\\ | They observed the //J// = 3 – 2 transition of SiO.\\ | ||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
| **[[https:// | **[[https:// | ||
| //Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.// **549**, Art. No. stag888 (2026).\\ | //Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.// **549**, Art. No. stag888 (2026).\\ | ||
| - | and detected a //v// = 5 SiO maser.\\ | + | SiO //v// = 8 //J// = 6 − 5 was detected possibly (meaning 3.0 ≲ S/N ≲ 5.0) in emission toward R Hya and in absorption toward S Pav and R Aql.\\ |
| + | \\ | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Employing the NRAO 11 m dish,\\ | ||
| + | F.J. Lovas, D.R. Johnson, D. Buhl, and L.E. Snyder\\ | ||
| + | identified\\ | ||
| + | **[[https:// | ||
| + | // | ||
| + | Among them was the //J// = 2 − 1 transition of < | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | F.O. Clark and F.J. Lovas\\ | ||
| + | detected similarly\\ | ||
| + | **[[https:// | ||
| + | // | ||
| + | The isotopolog was detected toward Orion A and Sgr B2. The < | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| Line 105: | Line 121: | ||
| The low mass-loss star was R Dor, the high mass-loss star was IK Tau. The very sensitive data permitted detection of < | The low mass-loss star was R Dor, the high mass-loss star was IK Tau. The very sensitive data permitted detection of < | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | B. Pimpanuwat et al. (see above)\\ | ||
| + | also report detections of < | ||
| + | **[[https:// | ||
| + | //Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.// **549**, Art. No. stag888 (2026).\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | Contributor(s): | + | Contributor(s): |
| ---- | ---- | ||