Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
molecules:ism:hydroxypropenal [2022/04/25 15:47] – mueller | molecules:ism:hydroxypropenal [2024/08/15 19:25] (current) – mueller | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
//Astron. Astrophys.// | //Astron. Astrophys.// | ||
3-Hydroxypropenal is the enol form of malonaldehyde. This enolic form is more stable than the dial because of intermolecular hydogen bonding. The molecule was identified through 11 lines in Band 7 corresponding to 19 //b//-type rotational transitions. Some of these are fully or partially blended. Two additional lines were clearly detected in Band 6 data. Rotation-tunneling transitions of //a//-type symmetry may be observable for somewhat higher excitation temperatures. However, the rest frequencies of stronger ones with low values of // | 3-Hydroxypropenal is the enol form of malonaldehyde. This enolic form is more stable than the dial because of intermolecular hydogen bonding. The molecule was identified through 11 lines in Band 7 corresponding to 19 //b//-type rotational transitions. Some of these are fully or partially blended. Two additional lines were clearly detected in Band 6 data. Rotation-tunneling transitions of //a//-type symmetry may be observable for somewhat higher excitation temperatures. However, the rest frequencies of stronger ones with low values of // | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | H. S. P. Müller, A. Coutens, J. K. Jørgensen, L. Margulès, R. A. Motiyenko, and J.-C. Guillemin\\ | ||
+ | published on\\ | ||
+ | **[[https:// | ||
+ | //Astron. Astrophys.// | ||
+ | The authors reported a very extensive line list from new (sub-) millimeter spectroscopic measurements. They were able to constrain the rotational temperature to 125 K. No additional lines were identified in the PILS data, but 7 additional lines were identified in archival ALMA data of the same source and with a similar spatial resolution. The column density is roughly a factor of 2.2 lower than that of propanal, a factor of about 42 lower than that of propene, and about a factor of 3 higher than that of propenal. The detection is now certainly beyond any doubt.\\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
---- | ---- | ||
- | Contributor(s): | + | Contributor(s): |
---- | ---- | ||